Legal Thinking Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Legal Thinking - Assignment ExampleIn inertial, the consistency in principle supposes that people are empower to well-grounded rights that follow from legislation and precedents that enforce coercion.Legal Interpretivism would be most useful for front-line supervisors. The reason is that legal interpretivism holds that there is no distinction between lawfulness and morals and that morality is non-existence outside of the law. As such, legal interpretivism is usually opposed to natural law theory and that it decides the morality of any situation. Like the constructivist style, interpretivists focus on integrity and thus looks to what best justifies the law as a whole. Legal interpretivism has some similarities with both natural law and legal positivism schools of thought (Venter, par. 7-14). immanent law has some basics rules consisting of fairness, justice and also equity that positive law ought to respect. On the other hand, legal positivism states that laws are created by gent lemans gentleman societies but were not discovered by nature and that they do not have any inherent connection to either justice or ethics. Therefore, legal interpretivism agrees that there is an external purpose for the law and that the law is a product of human societies. Due to the merger of the two schools of thought, legal interpretivism would be most adequate for supervisors since they would be following both positive and natural